In the meantime, I wanted to share with you the Mobile Chipset Hierarchy. moreI've replied to your previous comment, its very long so it is waiting for Moderators to Approve the comment for you to view it soon. We have 3 tiers in 600 series.īla, How could I mixed you with someone when I reply to your comment? 660 have A73 cores, while 65. Lower and higher medium class of chipset.
#HELIO P70 VS SNAPDRAGON 730 SERIES#
650 was 618 and 652 was 620, but those were so much powerfull with first incorporatiom of big cores A72 then their so called predecessors 615, 616 and 617 using only clusters of A53, that Qualcomm decided to split 600 series into two mid tier. When 650 and 652 arrived they had oficially different names. 660 is a succesor to first EVER premium mid end chipset, the 65x series. But 660 in another hand, is a different story. It is only more efficient due to more modern finnet, but they are performing simillary. 636 is not faster by a lot from his according to you, predeccesor 650/653/653. So why mentioning the 636 when that chipset arrived after 660? Problem is in you, my dear stuborn friend who likes to copy paste without understanding the relasing dates of each chispet. Then we see 636 which you said is downclocked 660. Next premium mid end chispet was 660 as it came right after, as a new gen. moreFirst aka premium mid end chipset from Qualcomm was 650, 652, 653. I am trying to communicate with you, but you are not comprehending w. Unfortunately, this will be my last response in this forum, there is nothing I can say or add on top of this that will be productive as a discussion for the readers.
Notice that all the processors that I've discussed are in that list, and you can see their performances.
please, go back and see my previous long post which had all the different processors in hierarchy with their average performance compiled into a list. USD ~$200, 4GB RAM, 64GB NAND, 720p, Camera is decent, Splash resistant USD ~$100, 2GB RAM, 32GB NAND, 540p, Camera is useable, No ingress protection Let me repeat/rephrase what I have already said. Too bad, everyone can go back and read my previous comments, and realise the disingenuous strategy you have concocted. You literally invented all of that rubbish, to argue against it, to make yourself look correct. And in case you haven't realised, I know about this stuff much more intricately than you do, and I know of the marketing, product cancellations and name changes too. I never said anything about release dates, or that the QSD 660 was not a successor of something. moreYou're arguing against yourself, not me. Bla, Dont you see I dont care for all those chipsets and prices for each.
0 kommentar(er)
